Phil Mendelsohn writes: > Um, if gdb is too hard, do they really know enough to be productive > with a symbolic debugger in the first place? Maybe you should just > keep a CVS branch that has print/cout statements every other line! ;) A better alternative is to actually include debug logging on the program. For many classes of applications, using a debugger is virtually impossible. Using the preprocessor, you can even compile it out of your non debug builds. -- David Phillips <david at acz.org> http://david.acz.org/ _______________________________________________ tclug-devel mailing list tclug-devel at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-devel