<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Could we continue the Post and discuss PCI compliance or better yet 'Bios' Hardening with what little I know about it? Obviously encryption is a better option for harddisks etc. I think any entered data that a user uses in a public 'box' should be automatically refreshed after it is sent 'and removed from the storage file'. I wish we could continue this discussion longer apparently no one cares. <br><br>Thank you all once again for positive help,<br><br><div>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 23:33:03 -0600<br>> From: aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu<br>> To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org<br>> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Do strong root passwords prevent alternative access?<br>> <br>> On 2014.02.27 23:26, tclug@freakzilla.com wrote:<br>> > Physical access to a machine trumps everything. Even strong encryption.<br>> Physical access will give you control of the hardware, but it doesn't get you a free pass to the encrypted data.<br>> Getting at that will generally require other things like a wrench and physical access to the owner.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota<br>> tclug-list@mn-linux.org<br>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list<br></div> </div></body>
</html>