<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><br><br><div><br>> Today's Topics:<br>> <br>> 1. Accidental copy was:Re: tclug-list Digest, Vol 101, Issue 21<br>> (Erik Anderson)<br>> 2. replying to digests one time too many (Mike Miller)<br>> 3. Re: replying to digests one time too many (Erik Mitchell)<br>> 4. Re: worst Linux/UNIX command line mistake, ever (elhaddi)<br>> 5. Re: replying to digests one time too many (Chuck Cole)<br>> 6. Re: replying to digests one time too many (gregrwm)<br>> <br>> <br>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 1<br>> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 17:01:24 -0500<br>> From: Erik Anderson <erikerik@gmail.com><br>> To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list@mn-linux.org><br>> Subject: [tclug-list] Accidental copy was:Re: tclug-list Digest, Vol<br>> 101, Issue 21<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CADdM08odRPOpRTA=9-9Ff7MZNzHhY4orQHPxzAMRfcL9jfiDLg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>> <br>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Paul graf <pj.world@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > I am a noober but what my mistake here at home was copy an openSUSE12.3<br>> > iso image to my primary harddisk instead of the thumb drive which was<br>> > intended.<br>> <br>> <br>> Paul, ***please*** read this and take my advice.<br>> <br>> Good mailing list etiquette requires that you do the following things:<br>> <br>> 1. If you insist on remaining subscribed to the list digest (it baffles me<br>> why you would do so), **please** strip out the irrelevant portions of the<br>> message, only leaving the specific bits of text that you are responding to.<br>> <br>> 2. Edit the subject line! How meaningful is this subject line to you:<br>> <br>> [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol 101, Issue 21<br>> <br>> Not very, is it. Edit the subject and make it meaningful. This not only<br>> makes list discussions much easier to track, but it also makes the list<br>> archives much more useful.<br>> <br>> So - others have mentioned this many times and you've apparently ignored<br>> the advice, but I'll try again - go here, sign in, and change "Digest Mode"<br>> to "off". This way, you'll get separate emails, delivered immediately,<br>> instead of a single daily digest.<br>> <br>> -Erik<br>> -------------- next part --------------<br>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>> URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20130518/cd1ec921/attachment-0001.html><br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 2<br>> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 17:26:22 -0500 (CDT)<br>> From: Mike Miller <mbmiller+l@gmail.com><br>> To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list@mn-linux.org><br>> Subject: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many<br>> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1305181719280.26110@taxa.psych.umn.edu><br>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII<br>> <br>> On Sat, 18 May 2013, Paul graf wrote:<br>> <br>> [one entire digest deleted here]<br>> <br>> Is Paul Graf just trying to torture us? It's getting to the point where I <br>> think it might be wiser to drop him from the list than to deal with this <br>> kind of nonsense. Several of us have taken the time, more than once each, <br>> to explain it to him, but I see no indication that all of our efforts have <br>> had any effect on him. I don't think he has sent a message to the list <br>> that didn't have a subject line of this form:<br>> <br>> Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol \d+, Issue \d+<br>> <br>> It's too bad because he seems interested in Linux and I would happily <br>> correspond with him under better conditions..<br>> <br>> Mike<br>> <br>> <br>> ------------------------------<br>> <br>> Message: 3<br>> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 18:21:34 -0500<br>> From: Erik Mitchell <erik.mitchell@gmail.com><br>> To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list@mn-linux.org><br>> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many<br>> Message-ID:<br>> <CANNReEFTMNdtG_1Ytd8hF5-LA7p+FDHxsSKJ4gtcmLn1DEr2gg@mail.gmail.com><br>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<br>> <br>> Why don't we do away with digest mode, and just move everyone who has<br>> made that selection over to the normal mode?<br>> <br>> -Erik<br>> <br>> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Mike Miller <mbmiller+l@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > On Sat, 18 May 2013, Paul graf wrote:<br>> ><br>> > [one entire digest deleted here]<br>> ><br>> > Is Paul Graf just trying to torture us? It's getting to the point where I<br>> > think it might be wiser to drop him from the list than to deal with this<br>> > kind of nonsense. Several of us have taken the time, more than once each,<br>> > to explain it to him, but I see no indication that all of our efforts have<br>> > had any effect on him. I don't think he has sent a message to the list that<br>> > didn't have a subject line of this form:<br>> ><br>> > Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol \d+, Issue \d+<br>> ><br>> > It's too bad because he seems interested in Linux and I would happily<br>> > correspond with him under better conditions..<br>> ><br>> > Mike<br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota<br>> > tclug-list@mn-linux.org<br>> > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> Erik K. Mitchell<br>> erik.mitchell@gmail.com<br><br>> Message: 5<br>> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 04:45:19 -0500<br>> From: "Chuck Cole" <cncole@earthlink.net><br>> To: "'TCLUG Mailing List'" <tclug-list@mn-linux.org><br>> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many<br>> Message-ID: <6B38DAB422E54A0D8B42522F267E6974@d830a><br>> <br>> +1 (repeated!)<br>> <br>> > -----Original Message-----<br>> > From: tclug-list-bounces@mn-linux.org<br>> > [mailto:tclug-list-bounces@mn-linux.org] On Behalf Of Erik Mitchell<br>> > Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:22 PM<br>> > To: TCLUG Mailing List<br>> > Subject: Re: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many<br>> ><br>> > Why don't we do away with digest mode, and just move everyone who has<br>> > made that selection over to the normal mode?<br>> ><br>> > -Erik<br>> ><br>> > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Mike Miller<br>> > <mbmiller+l@gmail.com> wrote:<br>> > > On Sat, 18 May 2013, Paul graf wrote:<br>> > ><br>> > > [one entire digest deleted here]<br>> > ><br>> > > Is Paul Graf just trying to torture us? It's getting to<br>> > the point where I<br>> > > think it might be wiser to drop him from the list than to<br>> > deal with this<br>> > > kind of nonsense. Several of us have taken the time, more<br>> > than once each,<br>> > > to explain it to him, but I see no indication that all of<br>> > our efforts have<br>> > > had any effect on him. I don't think he has sent a message<br>> > to the list that<br>> > > didn't have a subject line of this form:<br>> > ><br>> > > Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol \d+, Issue \d+<br>> > ><br>> > > It's too bad because he seems interested in Linux and I<br>> > would happily<br>> > > correspond with him under better conditions..<br>> > ><br>> > > Mike<br>> > > _______________________________________________<br>> > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota<br>> > > tclug-list@mn-linux.org<br>> > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list> *******************************************<br><br>I just want to apologize to everyone! I have turned digest mode off now. I am not trying to torture anyone. Is this better now because I have been confused as to how to properly respond to messages since I signed up. Sorry<br></div> </div></body>
</html>