that was what i was talking about. check with tom poe he has researched it considerably<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:07 PM, r j <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ronsmailbox5@gmail.com">ronsmailbox5@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">I am curious about the unused analog TV signal to deliver wireless internet access.<br>This article <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/wireless-internet-on-analog-tv-antenna" target="_blank">http://www.taranfx.com/wireless-internet-on-analog-tv-antenna</a> caught my attention.<br>
<br>{*<br>Australia’s CSIRO has announced that it had succeeded in prototyping
the transmission of wireless broadband Internet over spectrum reserved
for television broadcasts. This breakthrough in wireless technology that
will allow multiple users to upload content at the same time while
maintaining a data transfer rate of <b>12 megabits</b> per
second (Mbps), all over their old analog TV aerial, a good time to use
it when you are actually moving away from analog TV.
<p>The technology is named <b>Ngara</b>, and it allows up to 6
users to occupy the equivalent spectrum space of one television channel
(7 megahertz) and has a spectral efficiency of <b>20 bits per second per hertz</b>.
If these numbers confuse you, here’s something more simplistic — Ngara
can handle up to 3 times that of similar technology and maintains a data
rate more than 10 times the industry minimum standard.</p>
<p>Ngara is capable of delivering <a href="http://www.taranfx.com/tag/wireless" target="_blank">wireless data services</a> to houses within a 20 kilometer radius of a broadcast tower.</p>
<p>What makes this recent development interesting is how the technology
coincides with the phasing out of analog TV by the Department of
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy.</p>
<div style="float: right; margin: 4px;">
<ins style="display: inline-table; border: medium none; min-height: 200px; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; width: 200px;"><ins style="display: block; border: medium none; min-height: 200px; margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt; width: 200px;"></ins></ins></div>
<p>However,
there are tradeoffs. The trouble with Broadband-over-analog is that
many of today’s existing analog terrestrial broadcast towers are not
being maintained in the conversion to digital. The question is whether
those broadcast towers will continue to transmit signals for wireless
broadband, if not this technology would fail before even it impresses
us.</p>
<p>Another point to consider is cost and practical bandwidth. If its not
better than satellite, then it’s unlikely to take the home market by
big margins.</p>
<p>Ngara can achieve “ symmetrical 12Mbps per 1000 homes”, which is of
course nothing but a dialup connection. If Ngara can be made to scale
like commercial GSM and WiMax systems, we can hope to see its usage to
start in Australia, and spreading to the world.</p><p>*}<br></p> Would it be legal and possible to use in MN?<br><br>Sincerest apologies about not editing subject lines properly.<br><font color="#888888">,RJ<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota<br>
<a href="mailto:tclug-list@mn-linux.org">tclug-list@mn-linux.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list" target="_blank">http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>