<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Jeremy Olexa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jolexa@jolexa.net">jolexa@jolexa.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Mike Miller wrote:<br>
> FYI--<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://mlug.missouri.edu/%7Embmiller/pics/misc/20101214_Minn_AG_letter.jpg" target="_blank">http://mlug.missouri.edu/~mbmiller/pics/misc/20101214_Minn_AG_letter.jpg</a><br>
><br>
> Mike<br>
<br>
</div>Good job. Thanks for following through. I am sick of Brian Wood's spam.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-Jeremy<br>
</font><div><div></div><br></div></blockquote><div><br>Are you going to file a claim? <br><br>On the one hand, you didn't apply for the job, thus you can't argue you were discriminated against. On the other, the initial language may have precluded you from applying, thus giving rise to the argument of "preemptive discrimination". <br>
<br>I guess that's why lawyers make the big bucks? Either way score a victory for emphatically making a point. <br><br>-Rob<br> <br></div></div>