<p>Chuck -</p>
<p>It is logically impossible for Tony to prove a negative, but all you'd have to do is one current reference to show that you're not just blowing smoke. Care to do so?</p>
<p>Thomas</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Oct 1, 2010 4:51 AM, "Chuck Cole" <<a href="mailto:cncole@earthlink.net">cncole@earthlink.net</a>> wrote:<br><br><p><font color="#500050">> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: <a href="mailto:tclug-list-bounces@mn-linux.org">tclug-list-bounces@mn-linux.org</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:tclug-list-bounces@mn.">tclug-list-bounces@mn.</a>..</font></p><p><font color="#500050">> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:59 AM<br>> To: TCLUG Mailing List<br>> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Hidden...</font></p>
<p><font color="#500050">> Show me evidence that this can be done. All of that residual waveform<br>> stuff is no longer detect...</font></p>Too hard. You show evidence that it cannot, including all variants of<br>
platter imaging. Didn't say the drive "as delivered" could do it. I worked<br>
in the most advanced read/write end of the industry doing modeling, etc.. If<br>
you have, you probably wouldn't ask. If you haven't you might not have the<br>
PRML analysis, head design variant knowledge, knowledge of excess written<br>
space in data imaging on tracks, and spin stand background to follow the<br>
evidence. Didn't say it was easy or cheap. Did say it isn't trivial.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Chuck<br>
</font><p><font color="#500050"><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minneso...</font></p></blockquote></p>