<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Justin Krejci <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jus@krytosvirus.com">jus@krytosvirus.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Flip side to the buy fast/powerful is that if you don't truly need the absolute full speed and capabilities then get a cheaper model and when it dies out due to wear and tear or it becomes too slow for the work in a couple of years then get another one of the same price range which will be a lot more powerful then the one you buy today. Then you can keep an extra few bucks in your pocket or use for something else. Just food for thought and not necessarily an endorsement of this line of reasoning.<br>
</blockquote><div> <br>The reason I personally don't do that is to forestall the migration-tax. That is to say, to delay incurring the overhead of moving data, re-installing app, transferring licenses if necessary, recreating my development environment, etc... In short, set me = lazy. :) I'm not disagreeing here - just explaining part of my motivations. <br>
<br>-Rob<br><br></div></div>