<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Smith, Craig A <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Craig.A.Smith@honeywell.com">Craig.A.Smith@honeywell.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">>On 06/30 12:45 , Ryan Coleman wrote:<br>
>> Just 21MB? You're behind on the times... My 7D takes 30MB RAWs :-)<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">>On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 08:24, Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:<br>
>Hah! You youngsters and your newfangled 'cameras'. I grew up scratching<br>
>pictures on *rocks*! 'Paint' was the new technology, and I'm still not<br>
sure<br>
>it was a good idea!<br>
<br>
</div>Rocks! You had rocks? Before the planet cooled, we drew pictures out<br>
of dust and inter-stellar gases - always wondered how art would evolve<br>
as things started to coalesce.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Dust! You had matter cool enough to not be plasma? Last time I screwed around with abstract impressionism I took every particle in the universe and squished it into one tiny ball of perfect symmetry and then with a wiggle of my nose I shattered that symmetry and made a big abstract explosion of matter. You should have seen it. It was pretty cool. Cool as in awesome, since really it was very hot. <br>
<br>-Rob </div></div>