<div>Found a way around it. This crazy board has two SATA RAID controllers and Ubuntu liked the Intel one much better. Booting just straight IDE off the Promise controller and doing RAID-1 off the Intel controller. Seems to be working well.
<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Donovan Niesen</b> <<a href="mailto:dniesen@gmail.com">dniesen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">
<div>Maybe this is just my crappy SATA controllers then because I tried to just change the Promise controller to IDE and I'm getting the same errors. Only seems to boot when that controller is not enabled. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>It's still reading that drive because it attempts to boot from it. Would the order the BIOS sees the drives in matter? I'm thinking that maybe by tossing the other controller in the mix now my 120GB drive is SDD instead of SDA?
<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="e" id="q_1144152231503c59_1">
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Chad Walstrom</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:chewie@wookimus.net" target="_blank">chewie@wookimus.net</a>
> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I never use Promise "RAID" controllers. Either use a true hardware RAID<br>controller, or use software RAID. The on-board "RAID" controllers on
<br>most PC's are not true hardware RAID, and are therefore useless.<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></span></div>-- <br><span class="sg">Donovan Niesen </span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>
-- <br>Donovan Niesen