so you're saying to not use rmp or w/e and use the tar way?<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/27/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Sidney Cammeresi</b> <<a href="mailto:sac@cheesecake.org">sac@cheesecake.org</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 at 12.56.08 -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:<br>> I'd be much happier myself if they removed the
version.subversion<br>> portion of the name from the libraries - after all they symlink names to<br>> remove version numbers anyway. They could also drop the POSIX tradition<br>> of /usr/lib, /lib, and /usr/local/lib to place libraries in a common
<br>> directory with personalized versions installed in ~/lib.<br><br>i think you mean c:\windows\system32.<br><br>--<br>Sidney CAMMERESI<br><a href="http://www.cheesecake.org/sac/">http://www.cheesecake.org/sac/</a><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota<br><a href="mailto:tclug-list@mn-linux.org">tclug-list@mn-linux.org</a><br><a href="http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list">
http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list</a><br></blockquote></div><br>