I've grown to dislike dealing with software licenses for my systems. Microsoft is a chore. Redhat is no fun. Suse is a disaster. Cisco is a mess. I'm sure there is probably some certification path for software licenses nowadays. What a pain. Ubuntu for servers is a big ball of awesome. Mint (Ubuntu derivative) for desktop/laptop is fantastic. Centos for servers if you want that Redhat-like experience. I run a public mirror for all three of these distros at my work to help give back. <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Munir Nassar <nassarmu at gmail.com> </div><div>Date:01/05/2015 9:49 PM (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Which linux do you use? </div><div> </div>On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:34 PM, <tclug at freakzilla.com> wrote: > For business-use, Red Hat goign "too commercial" is a good thing. If I was > running a business that actually made money, I'd be using RHEL. Why? What does Red Hat provide that is so essential for running a business? _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota tclug-list at mn-linux.org http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20150105/b2f719b0/attachment.html>