I've used both Hudson and CruiseControl. Hudson seems to be easier to configure and more flexible - definitely worth a try. My impression is that both packages have approximately the same capabilities but the Hudson project has done more work on the interface. -Brady On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:56 PM, dutchman_mn at charter.net wrote: > I have been using Hudson (have not moved to Jenkins yet) successfully on a number of projects. It has lots of bells and whistles including a Mecurial plugin (http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Mercurial+Plugin) though I have not run into a client using Mecurial yet (SVN mostly). > > Perry > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM, John Gateley wrote: > >> Does anyone use CruiseControl or another alternative? We are using >> and it is not working well, especially the web interface. This would >> be for linux or solaris, so .NET is not a factor. It should support >> Mercurial for the source code control system. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Thanks >> >> John >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list