On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:22:42AM -0600, Justin Krejci wrote:
> Yep, this is why NAT is evil and bad in every way except for extending
> the life of IPv4.
It's not evil - it is more expensive for you and me. Auntie Em don't
care one way or another. Au contraire, NAT might protect her from
port scans and kiss of death packets (although indeed they have became
rarer these days).
Cheers,
florin
--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20110214/86a52de6/attachment.pgp>