On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:51:45AM -0600, gm5729 wrote:
> Sounds like you need GIT or SVN for revision control, and
> accountability/trackability of changes.
Wayne specifically talked about build artifacts. Adding 4gb daily to
GIT is not fun and to SVN might be downright impossible.
However, this brings out another question: why can't you run the build
on both sites? You can have only one site produce the 'blessed
release', but for nightlies, you might be better off to do it locally,
maybe even comparing the checksums of the binaries every once in a while.
Cheers,
florin
--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100312/e7fd8772/attachment.pgp