On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Florin Iucha <florin at iucha.net> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:10:58PM -0600, Florin Iucha wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:29:16PM -0600, Yaron wrote: > > > Hey, can we make it so emails to this list hve a reply-to that actually > > > goes to the list? Rather than to the original sender? I know it's been > > > brought up before, but I'd like to bring it up again! (: > > > > ... and can we also have the list spell-check the messages before they > > are sent out to all the members? > > > > Or, can the mailing list manager sniff out the user agent and notify > > the subscribers of the availability of free and improved MUAs? For > > instance Mutt has as default key-bindings: > > 'r' reply to sender > > 'L' reply to list > > It works quite well. You can also set it to use VI as the editor... > > Personally I need a mailing list manager that rejects messages which > have too low a pH level. The message above was unnecessarily > inflammatory and unhelpful. > > If I may try again: > > Yaron, > > What you need is to look back through the archives and find out why > the situation is what it is, and if your argument has been discussed > before, and if it was, why it was rejected or disconsidered. Then, if > you have new supporting arguments, enumerate them. After they are > considered and suitably discussed, ask for a vote. > > Best, > florin > > Go read 10 years of archives that aren't indexed by a search engine before asking a question? Do YOU do that before every post you submit? Your follow up wasn't more helpful. Just more condescending. Best, -Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100301/c7f0ea5a/attachment.htm