> -----Original Message----- > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org > [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org]On Behalf Of Mike Miller > Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 5:25 PM > To: TCLUG Mailing List > Subject: Re: [tclug-list] What distros do you no longer use? > > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Dan Rue wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:45:15PM -0500, Mike Miller wrote: > > > >> We're talking here about someone who said he won't use Ubuntu because > >> the name sounds silly to him. He might have been joking, but > it didn't > >> look like it to me. > > > > If names don't matter, why have you and us collectively spent so much > > time arguing about our own namesake? > > > > > http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/2008-Octobe > r/055072.html > > > It's not that names don't matter, and that's not what I said. It's that > the name of a thing is nowhere near as important as what the thing is. > Names like "Debian" or "Ubuntu" don't tell us much about the > distro and so > they shouldn't play much of a role in our choice of which to use. I'm > talking about the sound of the name here. Peanut Linux is small, > I think, > so that's a good name that tells us something about the distro. If I > thought the word "Debian" sounded silly, should I look for a different > distro to use? > > The GNU/Linux v Linux controversy seems to be highly emotional. I think > that GNU/Linux does a better job of describing the thing that you're > getting when you install some GNU/Linux or Linux distro. GNU programs > like "ls" (written by Richard M. Stallman and David MacKenzie) > are hard to > live without. That's why I think GNU/Linux is a better name than Linux, > but I don't want to argue that point again. I wouldn't decide not to use > any kind of software because the name sounded funny. I might not use a > distro if the authors strongly opposed calling it a GNU/Linux distro, but > that would be a political decision, not one based on the sound of a word. > > Mike Language perspective, not argument: The old German WWI word for a military tank was "schutzengrabenabwehrvernichtungskraftfahrwagen". That was a Guiness record for word length. Is there any wonder why it wasn't long before people more often used "tank". Even Germans often used a shorter term "panzerauto" by WWII. I'm among those that prefer the shorter term Linux and find GNU adequately embedded, as are Torvald, open source operating system, etc. Chuck