On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Dave Carlson wrote: > FUD. I like how that article gives BSD the credit for Solaris even > though Solaris has been SVR4-derived since 1992. That plus de Raadt > talking out of his ass equals a Forbes article, I guess... > > -Dave > > On Monday 29 January 2007 21:58, Mike Miller wrote: > http://www.forbes.com/intelligentinfrastructure/2005/06/16/linux-bsd-unix-cz_dl_0616theo.html Just so you know -- I sent that URL but that doesn't mean I agree with what the interviewee was saying. I'm quite happy with Linux so far. If FreeBSD is better in some way, I may never know that from experience. Even if I were to use FreeBSD, I doubt that differences in the kernels would mean much to me as a user. Mike