I vote null. That way I contribute to the 10% quorum but I don't sway the vote because I really don't care whether we block yahoo. I will be just as happy either way. I somewhat agree with Mike. I would like to know who the leadership is and who has official say in the voting protocol. That way I don't waste my time participating in meaningless procedures. TCLUG leaders make yourselves known to me. Now is the time to represent! ----- Original message ----- From: "Mike Miller" <mbmiller at taxa.epi.umn.edu> To: "Chad Walstrom" <chewie at wookimus.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:00:53 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [tclug-list] Proposal: Lift Yahoo! Ban On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Chad Walstrom wrote: > I vote, "Yes, lift the Yahoo! ban." > > Mike Miller <mbmiller at taxa.epi.umn.edu> wrote: >> OK, now what do we do? > > Just state your vote. I vote yes, because I it is possible to moderate > at a user level with the newer mailman software, and have new list > members moderated by default; something we couldn't do five+ years ago. > I fully expect those people who vote yes to be willing to volunteer as > list moderators. What a bizarre system for voting -- spam the list with votes. Are you, Chad, in a position of authority within TCLUG and so your suggestion is an official declaration from TCLUG about how we are now supposed to vote? It is extraordinary because it is causing so much trouble already and your idea will definitely make things a *lot* worse before they get better. In addition to my vote below, I suggest that we should meet sometime and come up with a better way of managing TCLUG. My vote: lift the ban. Mike _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota tclug-list at mn-linux.org http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list