On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 04:43:00PM +1300, listmail at brentfriedman.net wrote:
> I am about to set up a new venture using Linux servers.  I have used
> everything from slackware to debian to ubuntu for personal and non-public
> server use, but I haven't set up any "live" servers with Linux since
> Redhat switched to Fedora Core.  The servers will be running a php web
> service, with a mySQL back end.
> 
> I will not be the main admin for these boxes, as I will be pretty busy
> with the business end of the venture.  I am looking for a distro that has
> as automated a update/patch installation system as possible, whether free
> or less than $500/server/year.  Also, it would be helpful if the update
> system was GUI based.  Any suggestions about what you are using in a
> production environment would be really helpful.

I'm a Red Hat Certified Engineer and a Red Hat Community Ambassador so
I'm probably a little bit biased.  I admin about a dozen Red Hat
Enterprise Linux-based systems at work in a critical production
environment.  If these servers go down, so does a large portion of our
business.  We've been running Red Hat distributions for about 5 years.
Our servers are used for mail, ftp, samba, web, bugzilla, code
management, and some custom code.  A base RHEL ES subscription which
guarantees access to support and new releases runs about $350 per year
depending on the level of support you need.  There are mailing lists
dedicated to the RHEL releases that have an active intelligent community
that includes professionals and Red Hat employees.  The signal to noise
ratio is acceptably high (unlike the Fedora mailing lists).

At home, I run Tao Linux which is a rebuild of the RHEL 4 sources.  It's
totally free but I do see that security fixes tend to lag behind Red
Hat's release by a day or two.  It's good enough for me but not what I
would want to bet my business on.

I am extremely satisified with both the quality of the distribution and
with the support we've received both from Red Hat and from the
community.  Security fixes have been released promptly and back-ported
where appropriate instead of just providing an update to the latest
release (which may break binary compatability or break other non-related
features).

> As a follow-on question, I plan to pick up a few Dell Poweredge 2650 dual
> xeon systems on ebay.  Any thoughts on these systems running linux?

There is a mailing list dedicated to Linux on PowerEdge servers. I know
that there are Dell employees on it.  The list is at
http://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge

I run my Tao Linux distro on a PowerEdge 400SC and it's been flawless.
A quick scan on the linux-poweredge list shows that people are running
Linux on the 2650s and a few people have had problems and fixes
suggested to them.  I've heard a few grumblings about the PERC
controllers too so pay attention there.

        .../Ed

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts at ewilts.org
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program