On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:59:01 -0500 (CDT) Nate Carlson <natecars at real-time.com> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Josh Trutwin wrote: > > Ah, after being on a static network for so long I forgot all about > > dhcp. :) > > Heh! Lucky guy. My checkbook wasn't so lucky. > Extra NAT in front of the Linux box. Means that protocols that > aren't NAT friendly won't work nicely, and you may run into weird > little connectivity problems. A lot of times those boxes will only > forward TCP, ICMP, and UDP traffic - "huh, there are other > protocols?" > > I don't mind NAT, I just like being in control of the box doing the > NAT. :) Agreed, just like I like being in complete control of the firewalling as well, hardware solutions don't appeal as much. Hopefully I'll have this setup tomorrow, thanks again. Josh _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Help beta test TCLUG's potential new home: http://plone.mn-linux.org Got pictures for TCLUG? Beta test http://plone.mn-linux.org/gallery tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list