Another note- although this is possible, the signing would only show that the message itself passed through that particular server, and would not prove who really sent it. Encryption would be more useful, depending on how the policy was set up for that. Jay On Tuesday 17 June 2003 02:00 pm, Jay Kline wrote: > I imagine you could take the anti-spam SMTP passthrough/proxies and instead > of passing the message to Spamassassin or whatever, pass it to pgp or some > other encryption program. -- Jay Kline System/Network Administrator http://www.freeze.com/ _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list