On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 10:13, Josh Trutwin wrote: > Heh. > > You've been tagged as spam... > > Josh > > > This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached > > along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted > > mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > > > > Content preview: hooray for you. > > > > Content analysis details: (5.40 points, 5 required) > > NO_REAL_NAME (0.8 points) From: does not include a real name > > FROM_NO_LOWER (2.2 points) 'From' has no lower-case characters > > RATWARE_GROUPMAIL (2.9 points) Bulk email software fingerprint (Group > > Mail) found in headers ORIGINAL_MESSAGE (-0.5 points) Looks like a > > reply to a message Hmm, I remember that a lot of people had problems with a RATWARE rule a while ago. IIRC, it was an improperly written rule. I forget what the exact string is that causes this to be flagged, but it shows up in all TCLUG mail... Anyway, you should probably set that rule to have 0.0 or even a negative value in your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file. -- _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ I haven't lost my mind -- / \/ \(_)| ' // ._\ / - \(_)/ ./| ' /(__ it's backed up on tape \_||_/|_||_|_\\___/ \_-_/|_|\__\|_|_\ __) somewhere. [ Mike Hicks | http://umn.edu/~hick0088/ | mailto:hick0088 at tc.umn.edu ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030614/3b7d860f/attachment.pgp