On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, David Phillips wrote: > Which is entirely wrong, for one simple reason: it destroys useful > information. It also makes it much more difficult to reply to the sender of > a message and not to the list. give me one example of useful information that was lost on _this_ mailing list.... last i checked we are still depating this particular list and not lists in general, mainly because this is a list-by-list issue. > The basic premise of that essay is that it easier for people with lacking > MUAs to reply to the list, while not breaking things too much for people > with good MUAs. That is not a reasonable trade off for something that > destroys useful information. Several good mailers support Mail-Followup-To, > which is a much more correct solution to the problem. first explain _what_ useful information is lost, then we talk about if it is worth preserving if in fact it is lost. Munir Nassar RedConcepts.NET _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list