> UDP has a lot less overhead and is much faster over a clean/fast network. It just seems like they'd have to "re-invent" TCP in the implementation. And if you have to re-invent it, then you would have just as much or more overhead as TCP. I can understand UDP for short blips of information, like SNMP, but file transfer(you would think) would be the perfect application for TCP. Obviously its not that simple, and considering there is an option to do NFS on TCP, I'll bet it's a bit contentious a subject as well.