On Fri, 2001-09-14 at 09:17, Dave Sherohman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Thomas Eibner wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:49:48AM -0500, Dave Sherman wrote: > > > But in my case, suexec lives in /usr/sbin/. Is there a way to keep Apache from using it? I > > > will do some looking myself. Thanks. > > > > chmod -x /usr/sbin/suexec ? > > Hadn't thought of that... I know that suexec will be disabled if > apache can't find it on startup, so it would make sense for it to > also be disabled if it's there but not executable. > Just so everyone knows, Dave Sherohman's idea of renaming suexec worked fine. However, the chmod -x idea did *not* work. I think Apache still tried to use it, even though it was not executable. In my error_log I started seeing 'permission refused' after I tried that idea, but I simply made it executable again, and then renamed it so that Apache could not find it. Thanks for all the help. Dave Sherman (not Sherohman ;-) ) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20010914/38e6b267/attachment.pgp