On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:05 -0500, Kenny Lyons wrote: > As far as C++ IDE's go, I like Code::Blocks. It's a small download > compared to Eclipse,which is a good thing since I'm limited to a dial > up connection lately, and it works on Windows and Linux which comes in > handy for the stuff I work on too. It has also been developed steadily > over the past few years, though I would assume not as heavily as > Eclipse. You should check it out http://www.codeblocks.org/ > > Another good place to ask about IDE's (or anything C++ related) would > be at http://www.cpplc.net/forum I would agree that Code::Blocks is a good C++ IDE. I have made attempts to use Eclipse and found it to be huge, have a steep learning curve, and to be the sort of IDE that sucked you into its world and never let you go. I fired up Code::Blocks, pointed it at a whole bunch of source code, had it churn away for awhile and then had some very nice stuff for doing code archeology. I didn't have to use it to build my software, or even edit anything. I could just use the nice class browser to figure some things out. -- A word is nothing more or less than the series of historical connotations given to it. That's HOW we derive meaning, and to claim that there is an arbitrary meaning of words above and beyond the way people use them is a blatant misunderstanding of the nature of language. -- Anonymous blogger -- Eric Hopper (hopper at omnifarious.org http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper)-- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 185 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-devel/attachments/20090414/16d06743/attachment.pgp